|
TREASON:
"as declared in the Constitution, consisting only in levying war
against the U.S. or in giving aid and comfort to its enemies" New
World Dictionary - Second College Ed.
 When Congress was charged with
investigating 911, they did not look for this missing piece among the
potential motives behind the actions of that day. So of course they didn't
find it. Had they looked, this is some of what they would have discovered.
There were between three and five
military 'war games' being conducted on the morning of September eleventh
that were being coordinated through the Office of the Vice President of
the United States. Dick Cheney is not, nor has he ever been, a qualified
military officer: He did successfully dodge the draft, during Vietnam War
five times over, but that was as close as he ever got to military service.
His 'office' is not part of the Military Operations Chart, so long as the
alleged-president remains alive. Why then was Cheney involved in those
'War-Games' on September 11, 2001?
In the article below six articles
of Impeachment have already been drawn against Richard Cheney-the first
government official who ought to be Impeached! (1)
"War-games" are created
within the US military for training purposes, in this case these 'games'
had to come from NORAD, the North American Air Defense Command. Someone
had to design these particular war-games: That's important because the
targets in the games were patterned on the exact same events that took
place in the attacks upon the World Trade Center-on that day-right down to
having the exact same buildings as their targets. Specifically these
'war-games' involved the use of simulated hijacked aircraft being flown
into the trade-center towers, at the same time as the real planes hit the
real towers.
Condi told congress: "no one in
the US government could ever have imagined such a bizarre idea, as using
hijacked aircraft to knock down buildings" Maybe she was left out of that
loop, but this government KNEW a lot more than they have been admitting
to, about a lot of things that led up to and were involved in the events
of 911. Whoever created those war-games also had to know what was going to
happen long before it did happen. Because the closed-circuit software for
the games had to be created and then issued to the North East Air Corridor
radar sites, and that meant that they had to come from official NORAD
sources. It is crystal clear that NORAD command was involved, right up to
their phony gold-braid.
Why was the Commander of NORAD
not questioned about this fact? Why were not the local radar base
commanders, involved in both the games and the attacks; along with the FAA
who was also monitoring real time events, not also called to testify
before the 911 Commission? For that matter why was Congress not the
investigative body, instead of those compromised private individuals who
ended up serving on the bogus 'commission'?
Moreover-Why was Dick Cheney the
go-to guy for any real problems that might arise between the 'war-games'
and the unfolding historical events that burned September Eleventh into
the pages of history? None of this has ever been officially questioned.
Also missing from any official explanations for 911 was the
"role" played by George W. Bush?
The Secret Service guidelines for
protecting the unelected president were the same as they would have been
if he had been elected. He was to have immediately been placed under
Secret Service armed protection, and taken to a secure place where he
would then proceed to evaluate what was happening during the attacks, and
issue the response necessary to both stop the continuing attacks and rally
the nation. This should have happened immediately after the first aircraft
struck a building. However, Bush remained on-camera, in a second grade
class-room in Florida, for about twenty minutes-while an unknown number of
people were being burned to death in New York City. Air Force One was
waiting for him right outside, what kept him from fulfilling his
Constitutionally sworn duties? Why did congress not investigate this
potential act of treason? And why has no one demanded that Cheney be
investigated for his part in 911?
As a preliminary caution,
congress needs to send U.S. Marshals to find and arrest the man who
commanded NORAD during the attacks on September 11, because he obviously
lied to the commission. He should be held without bail, in a Maximum
Security Prison-pending a full investigation. The Vice President should be
subpoenaed to testify, under oath and in Open Session before committees of
both Houses of Congress. Due to the gravity of these allegations, Cheney
should be held incommunicado under the strictest form of house arrest, by
Marines if necessary, until this matter has been fully investigated. The
Decider himself also needs to be called before congress to explain, under
oath, exactly why he behaved as he did on 911, as well as who was actually
in-charge of anything on that infamous day!
Congress should not be confused
or troubled by the obvious hysterics that will come from the White House
over these things-because it is the JOB of Congress to investigate these
kinds of allegations, and to take action where appropriate, once the facts
have been made clear.
Now there's another real problem.
The third person in line, to stand-in for the president while both Bush
and the Vice President are being investigated, is none other than Nancy
Pelosi: She who has just sold out America's national interests to
Israel-in a legislative coup that gave back to the executive, those
particular powers of congress, that could have stopped the coming
War-on-Iran from happening; without a specific congressional approval for
such an attack. By surrendering the powers of the congress Pelosi
effectively gave the weapons of congress to those that feared them, and
now she wants to tell the people afterward "that she could do nothing,"
because congress has no powers! IF the War-on-Iran becomes that military
attack that so many now fear, then Pelosi will be bear full responsibility
for all that die in that coming conflict-and like Macbeth before her,
those blood-stained hands of hers will never-ever be clean again!
Here's what John Nichols said:
"The Democratic proposal for a timeline to withdraw troops from Iraq
included a provision that would have required President Bush to seek
congressional approval before using military force in Iran. It was an
entirely appropriate piece of the Iraq proposal, as the past experiences
of U.S. involvement in southeast Asia and Latin America have well
illustrated that when wars bleed across borders it becomes significantly
more difficult to end them.
Thus, fears about the prospect
that Bush might attack Iran are legitimately related to the debate about
how and when to end the occupation of Iraq. Unfortunately, Pelosi is so
desperate to advance her flawed spending legislation that she is willing
to bargain with any Democrat about any part of the proposal. Under
pressure from some conservative members of her caucus, and from the
American Israel Public Affairs Committee's (AIPAC) and from lobbyists
associated with neoconservative groupings that want war with Iran, Pelosi
agreed on Monday to strip the Iran provision from the spending bill that
has become the House leadership's primary vehicle for challenging the
administration's policies in the region.
One of the chief advocates for
eliminating the Iran provision, Nevada Democrat Shelley Berkley, said she
wanted it out of the legislation because she wants to maintain the threat
of U.S. military action as a tool in seeking to prevent Iran from
developing nuclear weapons." (2)
Here's the truly ironic part in
Pelosi's case: None of this needed to happen:
"Stop the War! Which
Congress can do anytime it wants, without impeachment, and without
stopping the funding. Congress, by the power granted to it in the
Constitution, declares wars, and also has the power to declare when a war
is over. So, Congress can declare that "the war and the US occupation
of Iraq is at an end, and that the president shall remove US forces from
that country." However that would require a congress that knew what
its role is, and was willing to act on its own authority-which the current
form of that body is not prepared to do!
So what's it going to be America
- do we have a functioning government who can investigate itself; One that
can live up to the oaths of office that each and every one of them swore
to uphold "against all enemies both foreign and domestic"? Or
will this all just get shoved under that filthy rug of evermore criminal
protections for the Traitors and thieves that have replaced what some
people thought we elected?
Jim Kirwan
NOTES:
| 
studios