|
The Vice-President is on an American
aircraft carrier off Japan, and the Decider has a scheduled trip that will
take him out-of-the-country. He'll probably be aboard Air Force One, but
that plane is only used to collect money-as an extension of his political
machine-it is doubtful that he could ever even pretend to operate the
world's most sophisticated flying-combat-operations-center that Air Force
One was designed to be. So what's the problem?
The problem dates back to
Ronnie's days in the Oval office, and to a plan that was hatched by
conspirators who feared Mr. Reagan might screw up, if the nation were
attacked. So they changed the org. chart regarding who would ultimately be
"responsible" for the national response and defense of the United
States-in the event of hostilities. All of this would have come out had
the 911 commission done even one-fifth of its job, in the aftermath of the
attacks of September 11, 2001.
Here's what was discovered by
some back in March of 2004. "Finally the smoke is clearing from the
skies over the events of 9-11. Several things are becoming clear. First
the Bushites did indeed make plans that altered the Clinton
administrations approach to terrorism. One of them was to strip commanders
in the field, within the USA, of any authority to act. All that authority
was placed directly upon the Secretary of Defense. The head of that
department is Donald S. Rumsfeld.
It should be remembered here that
Rummy spent the duration of the attacks on 9-11 in his office at the
Pentagon: without even trying to communicate with his department-never
mind the fact, that all of this blood that spilled after the first tower,
was by law, his responsibility. Is this one of the reasons that Rice is
reluctant to testify under oath? Because when this gets out that the
Bushites violated their own twisted revisions of national defense
procedures, and then dropped the ball completely: then there may well be a
demand for heads to roll! Below in the following four paragraphs, is what
the records show:
This document requires that the
Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, be personally responsible for
issuing intercept orders. Commanders in the field are stripped of all
authority to act. This amazing order came from S.A. Fry (Vice Admiral, US
Navy and Director, Joint Staff) so it appears that responsibility for the
US armed forces "Failure to Respond" rests directly with Fry for
issuing this instruction, as well as with Rumsfeld for failing to execute
his responsibility to issue orders in a timely fashion.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff Instruction CJCSI 3610.01A (dated 1 June 2001) was issued to provide
"guidance to the Deputy Director for Operations (DDO), National
Military Command Center (NMCC), and operational commanders in the event of
an aircraft piracy (hijacking) or request for destruction of derelict
airborne objects." This new instruction superseded CJCSI 3610.01 of
31 July 1997.
This CJCSI states, "In the
event of a hijacking, the NMCC will be notified by the most expeditious
means by the FAA. The NMCC will, with the exception of immediate responses
as authorized by referenced, forward requests for DOD assistance to the
Secretary of Defense for approval."
Reference D refers to Department
of Defense Directive 3025.15 (Feb. 18, 1997) which allows for commanders
in the field to provide assistance to save lives in an emergency situation
-- BUT any requests involving "potentially lethal support"
(including "combat and tactical vehicles, vessels or aircraft; or
ammunition") must still be approved by the Secretary of Defense. So
again, the ability to respond to a hijacking in any meaningful fashion is
stripped from the commanders in the field and given directly to Rummy!
Another discovery that these
documents clarifies, is that this administration did not give a damn about
what happened, as it was happening, which could explain part of their
hostility to having anyone apologize for those attacks on that
day." (1)
Given the above-in light of
current events now unfolding from London to the Korean peninsula (the
Pacific fleet is on a heightened alert status), coupled with the impending
attacks upon Iran and possibly Syria: Someone "big" needs to
locate the Secretary of War and track his every move-before and during
whatever is about to happen-because according to the documents above it
will be Robert M. Gates who shall be responsible for protecting America,
not the President or the VP, nor will it be Chertoff and HOMELAND
Security. As a matter of interest, either the president or the vice
president is supposed to remain in the country at all times-especially
during moments of high international tensions-so why are they both going
to be abroad at the same time NOW? (2)
When 911 "happened" the public
was caught off guard and we were basically blind-sided by something that
was unfamiliar to most Americans; at least when it comes to the US Chain
of Command. Now with six long years to think about all this deception
layered in so many lies-this time we ought to ask the right questions
IMMEDIATELY, should there be any vile attacks within this country AGAIN.
The "Decider" is nothing of the
kind; and the same holds true for his supposed role as "Commander-in-Chief" - thanks to the rearrangement of responsibilities in
that chain which has effectively broken the clear path that once led
directly to the president of the United States of America. This clearly
illustrates the differences between America-incorporated of which Bush is
the titular CEO; and what was the case under the now defunct US
Constitution.
The Outlaws fooled us once and
congress covered it up-this should never happen again, and it won't if we
demand answers from the corrupted media and the "government" that is
really no longer our own.
Jim Kirwan
NOTES:
| 
studios