|
The Pentagon's security videotapes impel us to take another look at what
took place. Lately there have many questions and theories as to "how" what
the public saw could have happened. This has led to widely varied
speculation about the planes and the towers to the crash in Pennsylvania
and of course to what hit the Pentagon. The fact of how many people died or
disappeared is still cloudy but the towers went down and there is a 10 by
20 foot hole in Pennsylvania; and there was a sixteen foot hole in the
Pentagon. The evidence has been widely discussed, but its collection was a
government job and so is suspect. What should also be discussed is the
entire responsibility chain that enabled what happened on 911: because what
comes through this rear-view mirror of wounded-history - is
catastrophically clear in far too many ways!
The public has been chewing on inconsistencies in the official stories
of 911 since the day it happened. 911 was the "Big Bang Theory"
behind hundreds of thousands of threads of inquiry about everything from
conspiracies to psychiatric studies on what makes America tick: yet what
all that these stories really did, was to provide cover for those major
crimes that sponsored the relevant but tangential discussions. Buried under
the wider circle of investigative and social discourse, were those topics
of pivotal importance that will burn throughout history in this American
Crime against itself. The amazing thing is that the answers that we're all
looking for have been out there all along...
Government in all its forms has been hard at work since 911 trying to
prevent any real evaluations from ever becoming part of the public's
dialogue. Largely then one would have to say that by misdirection,
obfuscation, and literally hundreds of tons of lies and distortions - they
have so far - succeeded! But consider the following before dumping the
farce of yesterday's video release. Perhaps we should really thank the
shills and all those phony websites that overreached and forced so many to
go back to the core issue - without which - so much of the world, would
still be whole.
Currently the Senate Intelligence Committee is questioning General
Michael Hayden - a uniformed USAF officer who has been appointed to head
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA): a civilian "intelligence
gathering" organization. Hayden currently works for John Negroponte.
"Negroponte was nominated as DNI (Director of national Intelligence)
in February 2005. That post was created in response to a recommendation
from the panel set up to investigate the September 11 attacks, the real
purpose of the position is to step up attacks on democratic rights and
prepare for repressive measures against the American people."
(1)
Negroponte has been no stranger to the use of lethal black-ops and illegal
activity in his long and ugly career. He should be in prison - no where
near anything that has to do with democratic rights or intelligence
gathering. General Hayden is Negroponte's current Deputy Director, which
should give the public some idea of the character of both men.
The intelligence panels of both houses were briefed by the White House
yesterday - and having been briefed - the members of those committees
cannot now talk about anything they learned in those "secret" briefings.
The White House has again effectively silenced both US Representatives and
the Senators appointed to question the nominee. The confirmation of General
Hayden will complete the takeover of another civilian agency by the
military, and will sink any chance for real transparency or accountability
by the military to the public. But this travesty is just the latest detail
in a myriad of cover-ups, and thousands of on-going lies that comprise what
was actually being sought by those who committed the crimes of 911.To get
to the bottom of this, real investigations need to be held - not with the
Clandestine Services - but with those particular public officials, in the
White House and the Pentagon, who designed the attacks upon the United
States on September 11, 2001.
The goal of these crimes was to free the unchecked powers within this
government to run riot over the world while silencing the US population
through intimidation by national security constraints, and by calling on
their favorite phrase - "in a time of war!" All of this they did, while
completing their destruction of the U.S. Constitution. Their tools were
blatantly simple. After granting Bush "a License to Kill" and passing the
Patriot Act, the complete compliance of the Congress was assured. We know
now, that the president has personally overridden some 750 laws that he
didn't "like" - and when you couple that with this massive and
ultra-secret spying scheme that turned the phone companies and our computer
ISP's into massive and secret organisms that now spy on every electronic
aspect of our lives; it is clear that there is a war between this
government and its people. The inner circle's stage begins to show itself
at last! What more could a dictator-in-waiting ever want?
To insure that this Second Act of the Coup was not discovered at the
time, public and political machinations of all kinds were developed about
the misuse of power, the failures of intelligence, corruptions, fraud,
insider-trading, sensitive leaks in super-secret agency "operations" and of
course the number of regime-changes in the world that their new illegal
powers now allowed them to make. This was only the public face of the
government that concealed the truth of what they had already done. They had
loosed the dogs of war, unleashed the vultures of greed, and ordered the
armies of racial hated and bigotry to conquer at will, without interference
from the Constitution or any need, for any federal oversight at all. This
is and was The New World Order that was freed from its chains on September
11, 2001 - yet to look and listen to the media or the government today - no
one would ever guess that such traitorous acts had ever been committed. The
only hint that leaks through this facade is the growing immigration war and
the over thirty years of policy failures that threaten to end with millions
in detention and the nation under lockdown.
The treason of the White House, facilitated by the Pentagon and combined
with London and Tel-Aviv who also played their parts - created this Cabal.
But throughout the mass-murder and the mayhem in these events, national
security types both here and abroad, were either silently incompetent, or
contemptuously guilty in the very real theft of that "power of the
people" - that was once the United States Government.
Listening to the farce of today's "public hearings" that purport to be a
grilling of this insider's insider - about his methods and the rightness of
everything united in these Un-United States - some questions come to mind.
If the Third Reich had had the kind of technology we use now then WWII
might have had a very different outcome. Is what we see today maybe just
the opening curtain for a global Fourth Reich that has no need for
nation-states? If a uniformed military officer is put in charge of civilian
rights and freedoms in the USA - is this not Fascist - is this not illegal
on its face? Whatever this is one thing is clear - the American public will
lose everything they thought they had, if this appointment is confirmed.
The fact of Nine-Eleven also triggered a flood of illegality, waves of
human torture and slaughter in many countries around the world, aside from
what it allowed the traitors to do here.
How was 911 possible?
Trillions and trillions of dollars were spent creating NORAD (North
American Air Defense), for the continental United States. This is a vast
and intricate system of missiles, of ground and airborne radar, and
thousands of fighter and bomber aircraft. This was designed specifically to
PREVENT anything remotely resembling 911. Perhaps tens-of-trillions of
dollars have been spent in the over fifty years of building up this complex
system - and yet on 911 NORAD failed! No one in any position of
responsibility, including the 911 truth commission, has actually even
seriously asked WHY! When will we begin to finally ask -Why not?
The government failures on September 11th were not within the Air
Defense System - they were directly attributable to Vice-President Dick
Cheney for diverting resources within NORAD, while overseeing a bogus
war-game that mirrored 911's targets perfectly in multiple war-games, on
the morning of 911. (4) These were exercises that tried to hide the real
attacks to protect the guilty from any possible later investigation of
their actions. The Commander of NORAD was later asked some questions but he
gave answers that had nothing to do with the realities of either his
responsibilities, or the actions that "didn't happen" on his
watch! Again - no one with a background in the air-defense of this nation
ever cross-examined that General. Why not?
The Secretary of Offense, Donald Rumsfeld was, by law, in charge of
military operations on that day: "Rummy spent the duration of the
attacks on 9-11 in his office at the Pentagon: without even trying to
communicate with his department - never mind the fact that all of the blood
that spilled after the first tower, was by law, his responsibility."
"This document requires that the Secretary of Defense, Donald
Rumsfeld, be personally responsible for issuing intercept orders.
Commanders in the field are stripped of all authority to act. This amazing
order came from S.A. Fry (Vice Admiral, US Navy and Director, Joint Staff)
so it appears that responsibility for the US armed forces "Failure to
Respond" rests directly with Fry for issuing this instruction, as well
as with Rumsfeld for failing to execute his responsibility to issue orders
in a timely fashion."(3)
What happened to "the Commander-in-Chief" in this quiet
reshuffling of the Chief Executive's legal and military responsibilities?
Where is our strutting banty-rooster's role in all these wars?
"Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction CJCSI 3610.01A
(dated 1 June 2001) was issued to provide "guidance to the Deputy
Director for Operations (DDO), National Military Command Center (NMCC), and
operational commanders in the event of an aircraft piracy (hijacking) or
request for destruction of derelict airborne objects." This new
instruction superseded CJCSI 3610.01 of 31 July 1997."
"This CJCSI states, "In the event of a hijacking, the NMCC
will be notified by the most expeditious means by the FAA. The NMCC will,
with the exception of immediate responses as authorized by referenced,
forward requests for DOD assistance to the Secretary of Defense for
approval."
"Reference D refers to Department of Defense Directive 3025.15
(Feb. 18, 1997) which allows for commanders in the field to provide
assistance to save lives in an emergency situation -- BUT any requests
involving "potentially lethal support" (including "combat
and tactical vehicles, vessels or aircraft; or ammunition") must still
be approved by the Secretary of Defense. So again, the ability to respond
to a hijacking in any meaningful fashion is stripped from the commanders in
the field and given directly to Rummy." (2) To date no intrepid
official has raised this chain of command requirement, at least not in
public!
The president on 911 was in Florida, speaking to some grade-school
students when he was notified by his Chief of Staff that the nation was
under attack. He was not removed by the Secret Service, nor did he
interrupt his scheduled meeting with a room full of second graders -
because he said, "he did not wish to upset the children."
Bush left Florida and disappeared into what was once Strategic Air
Command Headquarters, in Omaha. Finally that evening he snuck back into
Washington in one of six helicopters with his tail between his legs. This
was not the Commander-in-Thief's finest hour; because he was guilty of
cowardice, indecision and unconscionable-delays during what he said was
"a terrorist attack upon the United States of America." He went
AWOL during Vietnam, when he was supposed to be a pilot in the Air National
Guard - but the records of his service then were mysteriously burned. Once
a coward doesn't necessarily mean - but twice a coward? Why will Bush still
not speak to his part in the events of September 11th? After having
rewritten the rules of war and captivity, for anyone involved in the War on
Terror - what does Bush think his own responsibility was on the day that
all of this officially began.
Bush was never questioned by anyone with real responsibility, by
reporters, or by the public about where he was that day - about what he was
doing - or why he deserted his duty to report to the public in a timely
fashion on the horrific events of that day. He works for us - he's our
failed employee and Bush must answer for his personal failures. To this day
George W. Bush has still not explained himself to the American people! If
the actions of these three traitors are not indicative of something that
looks like treason, smells like treason and moves like a military coup
(designed to finished off what was begun with the Supreme Court's approval
of its own actions on 12-12- 2000 when they appointed Bush as the
forty-third president of the USA) (5) - then could
"what really happened on
that day" ever be used to prove otherwise?
What happened on 911 changed the world forever as we know it. That
series of actions created their license to bomb, to maim and murder people
by the hundreds of thousands - that will be millions - before these
unilateral actions finally run their course. All that blood, all that
terror and mistrust, the hatred and religious warfare gone ballistic, all
of it - because this latest bunch of psychotic bad-guys desperately wants
to complete their dreams of Empire. Has the public really no say in how all
this came about? National Security cannot be rightly used by traitors, as a
cover up for Treason!
Did we let them do this? How much of what they got away with could have
been prevented, if people had only spoken out? No one can change what
happened on 911 now. But together, people from all sides of this colossal
CRIME could begin to change what might happen next? To paraphrase George
Sr. "If people knew what we have done, they would hang us in the
streets."
Maybe we should all begin to question?
Jim Kirwan
NOTES:
|
studios