|
Long before the Internet there was an
America. Shortly after the Internet began, as a global medium for knowledge
and information, as well as communication, America On Line was born. Very
soon it became a household word that became simply AOL. It was one of many
ISP's and very soon it became one of the largest, and most profitable in a
large field of service oriented on-line institutions.
Then came the hijacking of the
nation by the cabal of Cheney-Bush. Shortly after that the disaster of 9-11
began to take us all into a completely other dimension. In this New World
Order, security became not just the most important thing, but also the only
thing that seemingly anyone cared about. Fear had once again triumphed over
freedom and civil rights. That ushered in TIA or Total Information
Awareness, with its director being a convicted felon, the former Admiral
John Poindexter. His idiocies were finally exposed and the programs
supposedly were killed, but they never died. They just changed their name
and are now not only healthy, but the FBI has just instituted all of
Poindexter's wildest dreams on all this nation's ISP's:
"Carnivore" is alive and well and inside whatever you send or
receive.
AOL, despite all their success and
their entire marketing, advertising, and increasing subscriber base, has
decided to become an unofficial arm of HOMELAND security and the Justice
department. To that end they have instituted new software that reads all
messages that pass through their ISP, and they have begun deciding who will
be allowed to read what. Hence America-On-Line has now become ASHCROFT-on-line.
AOL currently hides behind
"new software" which is their excuse for every intrusion into the
thoughts and transmissions between private individuals. Whenever anyone
complains about these detected intrusions into private communications
between any number of people a computer message handles all the
dirty-little-details and cannot be confronted about what is really going
on. So all attempts to discuss the reasons for any blocked messages have no
quarter to appeal to.
AOL is in effect hijacking what you
can say, or what those who are subscribers, are "allowed to read."
There does not seem to be a law against this foul practice, but there damn
well ought to be. The speed and ease of communication, without censorship,
by the government was part of the original appeal behind the Internet, and
was one of the reasons that this medium has become so popular among so many
world-wide.
So when you see AOL in that address
on your computer, just beware that whatever or whoever you are sending to,
or receiving from, is being closely monitored by several agencies of the
government. There are those who are not bothered by this 'added safeguard.'
But for the rest of us, please remember that AOL now stands for ASHCROFT
on-line.
AOL is also deceptive in their
privacy rules, hiding the names of those who own it and direct it: Once the
public learns about their current real purposes, they may not have a company
to worry about much longer. There will be an America long after AOL has
spent their unearned reputation, and gone the way of all despicable and
opportunistic endeavors: and that is as it should be. Because if AOL cannot
make it by being straight with its customer base, then they should fail,
after-all isn't that the "American-way-of-Business"?
These are very difficult times in
which we live. Everyone needs to be able to depend on what they are able to
learn, about all the various explosive situations that are unfolding on both
the national and international stages of our lives. Of course there's a lot
of disinformation out there on all sides. But no one needs to have yet
another false-flag institution in the middle of these debates. And no one
has asked for commercial censorship, except John "J. Edgar"
Ashcroft. If Ashcroft-on-line wants to continue as the US Department of
Justice's ISP, then they should say so, proudly! Otherwise they deserve to
lose the support of all those who disagree with their current policies.
Think about this. What's next from
AOL? Will they now begin to edit the messages sent, of course to better
protect their subscribers, from the big-bad wolf of world affairs? It's not
impossible: after all they are already the uninvited censors in all that
their subscribers now say or send so why not just help them out a bit
more, by adding or subtracting just a word or two?
The decision is yours to make. Will
you continue to use AOL, or receive e-mail from AOL addresses? This is not
about preference it's about survival. This is not a matter of commercial
choice it's about your rights to expected privacy, and the privacy that
you are paying to receive! Perhaps whether or not there will continue to be
an America, may also depend on the outting of institutions, such as Ashcroft
On Line. This is our country, and we ought to be able to have some say about
what goes on inside it!
|
studios