|
Rumsfeld in trying to explain his
actions on 911 to PBS on 3/5/04 said:
"The Department of Defense,
of course, is oriented to external threats. This was a domestic airplane
that was operated by people who were in the United States, against a US
target, which makes it historically a law enforcement issue. The
Department of Defense deals with external threats coming into the United
States-and that's what the department is organized, trained and equipped
to do."
Donald Rumsfeld is wrong - in
this case dead wrong. This view is what cost thousands more American their
lives on 911, than what would have happened, if the White House had not
failed to do its job in preventing everything after the first plane hit!
There is something called NORAD,
The North American Defense Command, which came into being somewhere back
near the 1950's. Its headquarters today is located beneath a mountain in
Colorado. Since its creation the United States has spent untold trillions
of taxpayer dollars just to prevent something like 911 from ever happening
here.
Everything that flies in or over
this country is tracked by both civilian (FAA) radar, and military (NORAD)
radar. This system is vast and intricate and while it is not foolproof, it
is sufficient to de-fang what took place on September 11th.
The procedure works like this.
Every aircraft files a flight plan, prior to takeoff, and has to check in
with Air Traffic Control upon leaving the ground. During the flight the
aircraft is tracked from takeoff to landing by elements of the FAA, but it
is never out of range or vision of military radar.
During the cold war the NORAD
system was used to defend the nation's airspace as certainly and as
swiftly as any traffic-cop would, when using a speed trap on a highway.
Everything that flew had to be identified and cleared to continue
throughout its flight by the military. If the course or the intent of the
aircraft was in doubt the US Air Force sent up fighters to investigate.
The time lag for identification to be made was 3 minutes. That was over
the United States, on US flights being made here, by anyone who happened
to be piloting the aircraft - so long as that aircraft appeared on radar.
NORAD is under the direction of
the Department of the Air Force, which is still under the direction of the
Department of Defense-who is directly responsible to the President of the
United States. The President is ultimately responsible for the air defense
of the continental United States and Alaska and Hawaii - in peace or war.
It should be noted that after the
1st attack upon the WTC, when the towers survived, there was from that day
until 911, intensified air patrols that monitored the airspace surrounding
the World Trade Center. For some reason those aircraft were not present on
that September morning.
On that morning, after air
traffic control knew that the aircraft had been hijacked, and especially
after the first plane hit the towers - US Air Force fighter aircraft
should have immediately been scrambled (sent to intercept the remaining
hijacked planes). What was taking place had to have appeared on dozens of
radarscopes in both the New York and Washington areas. Once the planes had
been identified as the planes that had been taken over by unknown
hijackers, the chain of command would have automatically been engaged with
requests for decisions as to how to respond. Simultaneously, messages
should have come from NORAD headquarters to the White House, or Air Force
One - wherever the president was at the time - requesting orders for what
the fighters should do regarding the potentially hostile aircraft. Yet
instead of plopping his ass in front of a video monitor for a
teleconference with his air defense chiefs, as well as the Joint Chiefs of
Staff (which would have been done under any hostile attack situation) -
Bush kept reading to a bunch of second-graders In Florida for an
additional twenty minutes, after the first plane hit.
On 911, no fighters appeared in
the skies over New York or Washington. The White House said there were
none available - the reality was much different. There were at least a
hundred interceptors available, but none took off, until after the attacks
were completed. In the 1950's the only way that could have happened was if
the President of the United States had order the US Air Force to
"stand-down." And to this day neither the White House, nor the
Secretary of Defense has ever offered an explanation of why this happened
as it did.
When Bush finally did re-board
Air Force One, he basically ran to Omaha to hide in the fortified bunkers
that used to belong to Strategic Air Command. This president needs to
explain his actions to the entire nation - because it appears that he is
guilty of cowardice in the face of the enemy. If Bush is innocent of such
an action then why has he yet to tell the people about his actions on that
day: especially given the number of people that died while his
administration fiddled around in completely inept confusion?
Those Air Force Generals in
charge of Operations on that day need to be subpoenaed to testify before
Congress in open session, to explain why all the rest of those in the
second tower and the Pentagon, as well as those on the Pennsylvania flight
had to die as well as those who were in the first tower.
Rumsfeld wants to claim that the
whole affair was a matter for the civilian authorities, as if a civil
crime was in progress, and so 911 was not within his jurisdiction, the DOD
being the US military, was not to interfere. That - is a flat out LIE!
Moreover, if this was a civilian
matter, then why did the United States retaliate with the US military for
a civilian crime? Also where did our dictator get off making this a global
problem, after having cast himself in the role of the leader of a Crusade
to exterminate the evil infidels that had militarily attacked the USA?
Let's not forget Guantanamo, and all those people who are charged as being
enemy combatants. If this was a civil crime and not a military operation,
then how could we have taken military prisoners and held them for years
without charges?
The Cabal can't have it both
ways. If this was an attack upon this nation, an act of war that required
the United States to invade another country: then where was the military
here at home? Where was our military that we have spent trillions on when
they were needed? Or if 911 was a civil crime, as Donald Rumsfeld says:
"a law enforcement issue," then how can Bush defend what we did
by way of retaliation?
This nation needs to stop the
bullshit and get to the heart of this matter! The Department of Defense is
responsible for the air space over the continental United States, and
that's a fact. Failure to interrupt the attacks of 911 in the hour and
forty-seven minutes that they waited for the attacks to come to an end -
amounts to the murder of thousands of additional American civilians.
Maybe the first attack might not
have been preventable, but everything after that first plane hit should
not have happened in the way that it did. The people responsible for this
crime against the people of this nation need to be held accountable, and
that would be the President of the United States, who was reading a book
to second graders, the Vice-President who from his secure location,
supposedly intervened to stop the interceptors from flying, and Donald
Rumsfeld for trying to cover it all up.
This action could begin to bring
closure to these events-and the time to do this is now!
|