|
Kirwan Articles
We Can Handle the Truth
January 24, 2003
You can also view
this article at America
Held Hostile
|
|
The people of the United States and
the world can handle the truth, the question is: 'Why can't Bush!'
For months now the Bush
administration has been sneering at the world, smugly declaring that
"Saddam lies, and Saddam continues to deceive." What exactly was
in those 8,000 pages that the U.S. removed from the Iraqi report to the
United Nations - and why were those pages removed? Could it be that Bush
knows more about what Iraq possesses http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/12.21A.us.firms.iraq.htm
because he knows exactly what we both gave and sold to Saddam?
|
|
The pretenders to American leadership have had many months to
make their case to the public and the world, why then is it becoming so
increasingly clear that there is no case? This is not some abstract debate;
hundreds of thousands of people will die if we invade Iraq. Millions of
people in the region and an unknown number of other nations will be affected
by the rash
|
|
actions of these petulant and secretive bandits
that have now suddenly become so impatient for war to begin - Again!
People are not stupid. The whole
world can see that the incomplete first war on terror has only accomplished
the signing of the pipeline contract with Unocal. http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/12.30A.afgh.pipe.htm.
And for all our military might and supposedly super-superior technological
genius, we can't find any of those targets that Bush said we would find,
flush out, and hunt down. What the bullyboys have done instead is try to
transfer the blame for America's security problems to an aging dictator with
a checkered past. This isn't the first time that the Western oil industry
has tried to steal the Iraqi oil fields, http://www.workers.org/ww/2002/iraqoil1031.php
but it may be the last time, if we proceed with this brazen aggression that
so far has found no basis in fact.
The 'TRUTH' is this country is
sinking into a morass of decline and decay that is being aided and abetted
by home-grown terrorists: Dick Cheney, Andrew Card, Richard Perle, Elliot
Abrams, Paul Wolfowitz, John Ashcroft, and Karl Rove. And this collection of
misbegotten failures, according to William Rivers Pitt, is being led by:
"George W. Bush, leader of the free world, who was eased into a
National Guard posting in Texas in 1972, and who by all accounts failed to
show up for this duty for some 17 months."
|
|
So Dubya, now the Commander-in Chief,
was an officer in the Air National Guard, and was AWOL during his Viet Nam
tour of stateside duty - but that was way back in '72. Why was this not a
factor in his failed run for the presidency?
Probably this information was
suppressed - the' really friendly' American media seemed to find it
unpatriotic to
|
|
to criticize a Republican candidate
for president. But now wearing his Thief-in Chief hat Gee Dubya's got a
problem. When a soldier salutes his president it's not the man that is being
honored, it's the Office. How then should an active duty military man or
woman behave toward this imposter? After all Bush is the man who stole the
Office which they as combatants, are required by the Universal Code of
Military Justice to honor and obey?
GI's also have a problem whenever
Bush picks a military setting to serve as audience to one of his arrogant,
chest-thumping performances on the nature of evil in the world, - and Saddam
in particular. The problem is that military personnel are not citizens, in
the sense that by military law, they cannot disagree with their
Commander-in-Chief. So the American military appears to approve entirely of
everything that is said.
|
|
The only other audience Dubya feels
comfortable speaking to it seems are children, because he feels confident
that they won't ask him any embarrassing questions.
If Bush is so vigorous and brave a
'leader-of-the-free-world': Why will he not hold an open press conference
and allow the press of the world to question him?
|
|
He would say, 'that for
security reasons, bla, bla, bla:' but the real reason is that Bush is a
personal coward, who cannot control his emotions or his tongue. This man is a public embarrassment to
the good people of the United States and to everyone who believes in the
dignity of human beings.
|
|
One does have to wonder where the
demonstrations for the war are? Why are there no PRO-WAR demonstrations?
Two reasons - those for it would never lower themselves from the top floors
of their executive suites to actually appear in the streets: And most of
those FOR WAR would not like the world to know who they are - because after
this Outlaw Action begins
|
|
the public will be going hunting for those who
wanted this to happen! Previously,
whenever the United States has been attacked, our leaders have always
demanded sacrifices of all Americans, in order to further those
actions, in which American leaders have ordered our sons and daughters to
fight and sometimes die for. When Bush announced his WAR on TERROR (an
open-ended conflict with no foreseeable conclusion) he smiled and told
Americans to just "Go shopping." Well what could we have expected
from a guy who thought his military service during Viet Nam was just another
chance to party?
When the nation was attacked on
September 11th, 2001 there was an outcry from many for a full and complete
investigation of that attack. The White House, to date, has successfully
blocked or covered up any and all attempts to hold such an investigation.
This is an outrage against the people of this country and against the
impartial judgment of history. The Congress and the Courts have furnished
Bush's band of Outlaws with additional legalistic cover for this heinous act
- and the public has been cowed by passage of both the USA PATRIOT Act, and
THE HOMELAND SECURITY Act which together now will form the prison gates that
will now begin the LOCK-DOWN of what remains of the rights of the people to
be protected from their own government.
The only member of the
administration who has clearly had military experience, Mr. Powell, has
broken with his own Powell Doctrine on two fronts. The Doctrine called for
overwhelming force (10 to 1 military advantage - or we don't fight) and a
clear and workable 'EXIT Strategy' (in Iraq we have NO exit strategy,
because we're NOT leaving). The region and the world have figured this out.
We're going to steal the Iraqi Oil fields, and keep them and their profits
for ourselves. And when that's accomplished, we'll probably use Iraq to
launch other attacks upon the remaining oil states in the region. Probably
the real reason we're so paranoid about Weapons of Mass Destruction is that
we're afraid that Saddam may poison his own wells by contaminating the oil -
to deny us the real goal of this attack.
And finally:
"January 4, 2002-"We
sentenced Nazi leaders to death for waging a war of aggression," says
International Law Professor Francis A. Boyle of the University of Illinois,
Urbana-Champaign.
|
|
By contrast, Prof. Boyle wants merely
to impeach George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and John Ashcroft
for their plans to invade Iraq and create a police state in America."
"Article II Sec. 4 of the
Constitution states that: "The President, Vice President and all Civil
Officers of the United States, shall be removed from
|
|
Office on Impeachment
for and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and
Misdemeanors." Boyle says that waging a war of
aggression is a crime under the Nuremberg Charter, Judgment and
Principles. "It's very clear," he adds, "if you read all
the press reports, they are going to devastate Baghdad, a metropolitan
area of 5 million people. The Nuremberg Charter clearly says the wanton
devastation of a city is a Nuremberg war crime."
It would appear that YES - there
are LIES and there is DECEPTION going on - but both appear to be coming
from the basements in Washington where the felons from previous
administrations dwell. And all those LIES are being uttered mostly from
the mouths of administration spokespersons. Now the whole world is
beginning to understand what a lot of Americans have refused to even
consider - it's Bush that is the problem, and not the meanderings of
Saddam as the head of one of our former semi-colonies.
And while it's great that our
European friends have chosen to rebuke this blatant aggression by the Bush
administration - isn't it time that the American public took
responsibility for this out-of-control, obviously unstable person who
pretends that he is the lawful leader of this nation. Because we haven't
intervened Bush now wants to claim leadership of the entire world. This
naked aggression by the US must be stopped BEFORE the killing starts, and
the best people to stop it now are the Americans in the U.S. House of
Representative who need to look seriously at Pre-emptive Impeachment.
Question is- will we be able to act in time?
|
|
kirwan
Back to top of page
|
|