|
Where are the Israeli's
October 2003
The US needs more troops to continue the occupation in Iraq. Maybe the
little country that says it is sovereign, but always turns to us for money
and has received $1.6 Trillion
by way of assistance from the taxpayers of the United States, might want
to come forward.
www.csmonitor.com/

Militarily the new USA is now stretched too thin. Thanks to the complete diplomatic failures of Little Big-Mouth, we’ve not been able to attract
help from the ‘other’ nations that we tried to intimidate prior to our
invasion.
Assuming that we’re not going to do the right thing and just leave
Afghanistan and Iraq especially given our miserable performance in
attempting to manage the after-action occupations, not to mention the
non-reconstruction of either Afghanistan or Iraq. And since Bush keeps
overloading us with phrases like "Bring ‘em on!" –
"we" obviously need some additional military help.
So perhaps it’s time for a gesture of payback, some token of goodwill in
exchange for fighting all their wars for them. The little country really
ought to have their own troops in these places anyhow – doing their own
dirty work for themselves, and this time under their own flag, instead of
using ours.
Of course it used to be illegal for members of the U.S. Government to
receive political ‘donations’ from foreign countries, or foreign
nationals – but in the case of Israel, it seems that US laws do not
apply. In fact it’s rumored to be very difficult to be in the US
Congress unless one favors virtually everything that Israel wants to have
approved. Given the
$1, 600,000,000,000 already ‘invested’ - Why is this policy never
questioned?
The Israeli’s planned this war, even before Bush took charge of the
White House. So why shouldn’t they be the ones with targets on their
backs everyday? After all, they have received far more of the US taxpayer’s
money than any state in the Union, and they give us nothing for that kind
of help. Besides, they’ve a lot more experience pushing conquered people
around. Just yesterday they attacked Syria for the first time in two
decades - on another pretext: is this the opening round in our next aggression?
That may sound
outrageous but there are 5 countries in the Middle East they have targeted
for us, and Syria is one of them.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/
In Palestine they’ve succeeded in making open murder a regular part of
their ‘political’ actions, against those they disagree with – so why
not let them try their methods in a country where there are some weapons
in the hands of the "conquered" – where the subject population
can do more than just throw stones? What are friends for if they don’t
come to help when their benefactors are so obviously in need of
assistance? 20,000 hardened troops might do for a start.
Some might say that this would destabilize the region, if not the world.
But this is a "nation" that has nuclear, chemical, and
biological weapons in abundance – just as we do. Plus, between their
missiles and their air power they possess the means to deliver those
weapons anywhere. Since all of this chaos of "Enduring Freedoms"
at the price of American Freedoms has become intense, Israel has remained
silently engrossed in annexing more Palestinian land, and killing off more
of those who resist their occupations. Between regularly destroying any
peace plans that might surface in their region, while loosing their rogue
agents on the world, to perform sanctioned hits in other countries: Israel
has otherwise maintained a low profile.
The Israeli’s planned this war, even before Bush took charge of the
White House. So why shouldn’t they be the ones with targets on their
backs everyday? After all, they have received far more of the US taxpayer’s
money than any state in the Union, and they give us nothing for that kind
of help.
Besides, they’ve a lot more experience pushing conquered people
around. Just yesterday they attacked Syria for the first time in two
decades - on another pretext: is this the opening round in our next
aggression? That may sound outrageous but there are 5 countries in the
Middle East they have targeted for us, and Syria is one of them.
But now because of money we’re coming down to reality, and we need some
help – so where are the mighty warriors from that nearly invisible
nation? They’re still ‘expanding’ their little settlements, and
stealing land from those whom they are supposed to protect – and they
need to have the time to continue with the murder and enslavement of those
they are supposedly occupying.
Israel is unique. That country remains outside the major monetary blocks
of transnational affairs and yet it is shunned by most of the civilized
world. The USA seems to be the only ‘power’ to have taken up their
interests, but this has been a strictly one-way road – "we"
have nothing to say about what Israel does or does not do. Still, isn’t
it about time that Israel began to pay more for the perks they’ve been
receiving – with their own troops, their own weapons, and their own
tactics –so they can show the world how a true occupation ought to be
run!
If Israel can’t do that, then maybe they should begin paying back at
least half that money which we have given them. Like Bush, Sharon is a
lousy diplomat, and an even worse head of state. But money is money, and
it should speak much louder than it has been allowed to – in the Middle
East.
The taxpayers of the United States are owed both an explanation and a
return on their money. So when should we expect to see the IDF
triumphantly relieving the US troops of the occupation in Iraq?
kirwan
Back to top of page
|