|
The
headlines scream, the net is lighting up like New Year’s Eve before
"The Death of the American Republic" at the turn of this century.
The government’s media arm is stilted, almost silenced by the scale of an
ever-growing resistance of so many, to this dirty little war of conquest
that is failing to succeed. Newscasts are confining themselves to a few
short minutes of coverage of the debacle that looks more like a desert
version of Viet Nam with every passing day. Our generals are serious,
determined that this be seen as just another minor situation that yet
another ridiculously named ‘operation’ will be sure to crush. But when
the next day dawns, the operation is renamed, and the generals repeat the
same tired phrases, because there is still no plan – and still no
overwhelming victory anywhere to claim.
What happened to telling us what is
really going on? Those troops are Americans for the most part, whether
private security forces, or uniformed military. Do we not have the right to
know what is happening to them? Why are so many still dying now, when this
war was declared to have been over, long ago? What about the massive outlays
of expenses being paid, or given freely to Israel: All the money being used
for whatever purpose, is ours, do we not have the right to know how that is
being spent?
When we went to war there were
television specials weekly. The coverage was total and unending – so where
are they now with Peter Jennings reporting "From the Front"? Where
is the intrepid Dan Rather with insight from "Behind the Lines"?
The body count is growing daily and still the public, those without cable or
satellite access, is not being told much of anything. This story is often
shoved back behind "the news" of local happenings, a house fire
here, a shooting there, but this is an event that will change everything
about our economy, our welfare, and our way of life: and ultimately our
world. Still the media arm of this US government does not dare allow us to
see or hear the news, in the blood-drenched detail that is reality in Iraq
these days. Why not? Because this may reflect badly on those that the
station’s owners have been supporting since long before the failed
elections of 2000—that would be the Bushwhackers and their ranks of
impossibly inept cabinet members, hell bent on Empire!
A ‘commission on 9-11’ was
established to cover-up the truth. And much is being said about all the
melodrama of peripheral events that still manage to avoid the gruesome and
the deadly truths that happened on that day. The basic facts are these. The
administration knew enough before 911 to warn their friends not to fly
during the week in question. No one has yet questioned how this was
possible, since they claim that they did not know enough to even pay
attention to the possibilities of an attack. And yet, the dirty truth
continues to seep out and with every new revelation it becomes ever-clearer,
that if this was not an inside job, it is the closet thing to one, that most
have ever seen.
Is this why the commission is not a
congressional investigation, but a privately appointed group? Because of
this fact, the White House can control the length of time the commission can
have to finish-up. They can also force the report to go back through the
White House for censorship, before the report is published. Congress cannot
be so controlled, which is why they passed on the right to investigate this
fully, as they were supposed to do, had the constitutional requirements been
observed.
Bottom line—the government is
lying to us again, this time by omission, if not by outright complicity in
whatever happened on 911.
Congress has the right to call the
President and anyone else to testify under oath before them, if they had
chosen to be the investigating body here. They allowed themselves to be
by-passed instead. By avoiding the spotlight now, congress has become
complicit in this continuing crime that implicates them as well, in the
murder of thousands on that September morning.
Speaking of what we do not know,
there is one other glaring absence. What has happened to George W. Bush?
Where oh where is our brilliant and courageous leader? Why he’s down in
Texas somewhere on his ranch, probably digging himself an eight by twelve
foot hole in which to hide from prosecution. This is, by the way, the second
time that simple George has run away, whenever the blood has begun to flow.
The first instance was actually on the morning of 911.
It seems, that Ronnie
& Cheney & Rummy succeeded, during the Reagan
administration, in creating something called the Armageddon Plan. In this
particular piece of off-the-books, unconstitutional insanity, created an
entirely different set of priorities for political control of the nation, in
the event of an attack upon this country.
What makes it so horrendous is that
congress is charged with creating plans like this - not the paranoid crazies
in the executive branch of government. When congress does this, it's
legal, because there has to be input from the public, however indirectly.
When the executive branch does this, then that's a coup, because it is
not their job, and it’s certainly not their call.
The executive's function is to
carry out the wishes of congress. The Tarnished House is not authorized to
redesign the country in any way it chooses, and especially not without
the direct involvement of congress and the people.
Finally, these criminals went
further - they implemented their dirty little plan. The conspiracy
theorists, according to ABC News interviews with those who loved it, have
dreamed of this for decades. When the bandits took the Tarnished House, they
began practicing their little plot, in real time exercises: And
on 9-11 they put their plot into actual use for the first time—in
total secrecy!
What this does explain is the
"hum" that is being heard in many places around the USA.
http://www.amasci.com/hum/newshum.txt
This is the government creating underground bunkers for themselves, most
recently the stories have dealt with several Southwestern cities; but
they've already done some of their work in Washington State, and beneath the
new airport in Denver.
http://www.anomalies-unlimited.com/Denver_Airport.html
These massive projects have never
been acknowledged, explained, or referenced openly by this government. But
the costs involved have to have been massive - and their real purposes
cannot be good for those who have paid for them. Congress needs to look
fully into all of this obviously secret construction, and air a full report
to the nation about it.
This was the reason that our
cowardly leader ran away to Omaha on 911. Insiders say that he
"protested" - saying that he wanted to get back to the
Tarnished House and act like a man. But Cheney told him that he couldn't.
Ask yourself how it is that Cheney can tell the imposter anything,
especially during an attack upon the nation. But according to the program,
now the defacto law of USA, that’s exactly what Bush was supposed to do,
and "that" explains why he disappeared that day.
The reasoning beneath the
Armageddon Plan is that it is their responsibility is to ensure (by creating
three separate governments, in three different secret locations) the
uninterrupted flow of services from the federal government, in the
event of any attack. This is particularly strange as most of the country
thinks that the government's job is to defend the nation from attacks, and
not to worry about the continuity of IRS, or the Post Office, until after
the attacks are dealt with. Apparently this is no longer the case. Don't you
feel safer knowing that three groups of otherwise useless figureheads, with
their chosen assistants, have been whisked around the country (at no small
expense), to fully functional underground cities, (air-conditioned, and
fully stocked bunkers), so that their government can continue. This was the
case on 911 - even as the fireballs had not even finished burning. Don’t
you just love their dedication to all the wrong things!
This does not however explain why
Bush is in hiding: Now that our forces are facing an entirely reenergized
resistance. This is a resistance that Bush and his administration have
created with the brutality and the insensitivity of their policies and their
out-of-control actions on the ground in Iraq. We don’t even speak the
language of the people we are now dictating to, we are not familiar with
their culture, their religious beliefs, or with much of anything that forms
the basis for their lives or their dreams for a better tomorrow. Yet we have
attacked them with mega-force and slaughtered thousands of them, as in the
name of liberty and democracy, we are continuing to kill them in order to
save them! Is this the America that you grew up in?
So why aren’t we able to hear
from our invisible leader of the "free world"? Where is the press
conference that should have happened already, the one where reporters could
ask the really tough questions about the real reasons for what is happening
now? Maybe they might ask about the choices that have led directly to the
unification of centuries-old-enemies coming together now—to attack us, as
their singularly most hated mutual enemy?
The president is supposed to lead
the nation, not run away when the nation is attacked. Bush should be charged
with cowardice in the face of the enemy because he was running, even before
the attacks were completed.
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0318-14.htm
All of those that died after the
first plane hit the first tower to be struck were murdered by the
inattention of their government. Because the government was charged with
protecting everyone from what came next. And if those responsible are not
charged with this crime, then justice will not have been served. The world
has come to know this, the only ones still in any doubt seem to be the
American public. And this is due in large part to the unconscionable failure
by the media here to cover this story at all.
It's no wonder that they don't want
the particulars of these events investigated, because then each of those
involved, including the major media managers, would then have to explain
exactly what they did before, during, and after September 11th and
that would produce massive violence, which would probably result in a regime
change here and now.
|