|
Finally the smoke is clearing from
the skies over the events of 9-11. Several things are becoming clear.
First the Bushites did indeed make plans that altered the Clinton
administrations approach to terrorism. One of them was to strip commanders
in the field, within the USA, of any authority to act. All that authority
was placed directly upon the Secretary of Defense. The head of that
department is Donald S. Rumsfeld.
It should be remembered here that
Rummy spent the duration of the attacks on 9-11 in his office at the
Pentagon: without even trying to communicate with his department--never
mind the fact, that all of this blood that spilled after the first tower,
was by law, his responsibility. Is this one of the reasons that Rice is
reluctant to testify under oath? Because when this gets out that the
Bushites violated their own twisted revisions of national defense
procedures, and then dropped the ball completely: then there may well be a
demand for heads to roll! Below in the following four paragraphs, is what
the records show:
This document requires that the
Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, be personally responsible for
issuing intercept orders. Commanders in the field are stripped of all
authority to act. This amazing order came from S.A. Fry (Vice Admiral, US
Navy and Director, Joint Staff) so it appears that responsibility for the
US armed forces "Failure to Respond" rests directly with Fry for
issuing this instruction, as well as with Rumsfeld for failing to execute
his responsibility to issue orders in a timely fashion.
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of
Staff Instruction CJCSI 3610.01A (dated 1 June 2001) was issued to provide
"guidance to the Deputy Director for Operations (DDO), National
Military Command Center (NMCC), and operational commanders in the event of
an aircraft piracy (hijacking) or request for destruction of derelict
airborne objects." This new instruction superseded CJCSI 3610.01 of
31 July 1997.
This CJCSI states, "In the
event of a hijacking, the NMCC will be notified by the most expeditious
means by the FAA. The NMCC will, with the exception of immediate responses
as authorized by referenced, forward requests for DOD assistance to the
Secretary of Defense for approval."
Reference D refers to Department
of Defense Directive 3025.15 (Feb. 18, 1997) which allows for commanders
in the field to provide assistance to save lives in an emergency situation
-- BUT any requests involving "potentially lethal support"
(including "combat and tactical vehicles, vessels or aircraft; or
ammunition") must still be approved by the Secretary of Defense. So
again, the ability to respond to a hijacking in any meaningful fashion is
stripped from the commanders in the field and given directly to Rummy!
Another discovery that these
documents clarifies, is that this administration did not give a damn about
what happened, as it was happening, which could explain part of their
hostility to having anyone apologize for those attacks on that day.
This was an extended and vicious
attack upon this nation. It was also the cold-blooded slaughter of
thousands of people. The 9-11 commission was callously constituted not to
look into these events themselves, but instead to look at policy
questions, which is about as worthwhile as watching grass grow. But as
each new revelation breaks out of the fog of war surrounding 9-11, it
becomes evermore clear to the world that this was an inside job.
Yesterday Condoleezza Rice was
outted as the one who called people before the 11th and warned them not to
fly on that day. On May 17, 2002, Pacifica Radio reported that Rice was
the source of the call to San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown. See side bar:
http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/05/Bush_knew2.html
THE ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT
FOR NATIONAL SECURITY AFFAIRS CONDOLEEZZA RICE CALLED A FRIEND THE DAY
BEFORE SEPTEMBER 11TH AND TOLD HIM TO STAY OUT OF THE AIR THAT WEEK.
This leads to only one question
and surely President Bush or Condoleezza Rice will not find any
precedence, in the US Rule Book on Behavior, to refuse this answer to the
American people: WHO WARNED YOU! Who gave you this information that you
were so eager to warn all those Bush-special-friends and associates about?
What source of info did Bush and Rice have? Important enough for them to
warn their friends about, and gave Rice the job of calling everyone
PERSONALLY?
The other side of this question,
plain and simple: Who determined the names that should be warned and those
who should not be warned about coming to New York? Entire corporations who
had offices in the WTC did not show up at work September 11th. But what
about those who did report to the office as usual? Like Schindler's List,
the public needs to see the Contessa's List!
Better yet all of these
"questions" need to be fully aired, under oath, before the
public at the Commission hearings on 9-11. Maybe then we can begin to cut
out the heart of this cancer that has been eating at the world since that
September day in 2001.
| 
studios